When to choose IEC 62061 vs ISO 13849
Both are harmonized under the EU Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC. Both cover the safety control system of a machine. They produce the same level of risk reduction if applied correctly. The choice is mostly about vocabulary and tooling preferences:
| Aspect | ISO 13849-1 | IEC 62061 |
|---|
| Vocabulary | PL a-e, Categories B/1/2/3/4 | SIL 1-3, Architectures A-D |
| Origin | Mechanical engineering tradition (ex-EN 954-1) | IEC 61508 machinery adaptation |
| Mode | High demand only (PFHD) | High demand only (PFHD) |
| Software | Simplified treatment | Full IEC 61508-3 software requirements |
| Component certification | Wide (Pilz, Sick, Schmersal libraries) | Wide (overlaps with IEC 61508) |
| Designer tool | SISTEMA (free, IFA) | Spreadsheet calculators, less mature tooling |
| Best fit | Standard machinery (assembly lines, conveyors, presses) | Complex machinery with significant programmable electronic content |
In practice: ISO 13849 dominates Europe for typical machinery. IEC 62061 is used when:
- The machine has substantial embedded software logic (Cat 4 + complex software → IEC 62061 software requirements are more rigorous)
- The vendor wants to leverage existing IEC 61508 component certifications without rework
- The machine sits at the boundary between machinery and process industry (e.g., a packaging machine in a chemical plant) where SIL language matches the rest of the safety functions
The 4 architectures
IEC 62061 simplifies architectures into 4 classes:
| Arch | Description | Equivalent ISO 13849 |
|---|
| A | Single channel, no diagnostics | Cat B / 1 |
| B | Single channel with diagnostics (test before use) | Cat 2 |
| C | Redundant channels (1oo2), no diagnostics | Cat 3 (partial) |
| D | Redundant channels with cross-monitoring + diagnostics | Cat 3 / Cat 4 |
For SIL 3 (the typical maximum in machinery), architecture D is required: dual channel with cross-monitoring achieving DC > 99%.
Joint convergence work (on hold)
ISO and IEC started a joint project — IEC/ISO 17305 — to unify ISO 13849 and IEC 62061 into a single standard. The work was suspended around 2015 due to unresolved methodological differences. As of 2026, both standards remain active and both will continue to be harmonized under the upcoming Machinery Regulation 2027 (replacing the 2006 Directive).
For practitioners: pick one, document the choice in your Safety Requirements Specification, and stick with it for the whole machine. Mixing approaches on the same SRECS creates documentation nightmares.