IndustryHub
APPRENDRE / NORMES / IEC

IEC 62061

⚠ Cette page n'est pas encore traduite. Affichage en anglais.
IEC 62061

Functional Safety of Safety-related Control Systems for Machinery

IEC 62061 applies IEC 61508 functional safety principles to the machinery sector, using SIL 1-3 language. It is the SIL-based alternative to ISO 13849 (PL-based). Both are harmonized under the EU Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC.

Structure du document

IEC 62061:2021

Functional safety of safety-related control systems

Single-part standard. Defines SRECS (Safety-Related Electrical Control Systems), SIL 1-3 framework for machinery, PFHD targets, architectural constraints, software requirements adapted from IEC 61508-3.

Concepts clés

Safety-Related Electrical Control System(SRECS)
The IEC 62061 term for the safety control system of a machine. Equivalent to SRP/CS in ISO 13849 (different vocabulary, similar scope). Covers electrical, electronic, and programmable electronic safety functions.
Safety Integrity Level for Machinery(SIL CL)
Same scale as IEC 61508 SIL but capped at SIL 3 for machinery (SIL 4 has no practical application in single-machine context). SIL CL = SIL Claim Limit when used in machine vendor datasheets.
Probability of dangerous Failure per Hour(PFHD)
Same metric as ISO 13849. SIL 1: 10⁻⁶ ≤ PFHD < 10⁻⁵. SIL 2: 10⁻⁷ ≤ PFHD < 10⁻⁶. SIL 3: 10⁻⁸ ≤ PFHD < 10⁻⁷.
Architecture A, B, C, D
IEC 62061 4 reference architectures, broadly equivalent to ISO 13849's Cat B/1/2/3/4 but expressed as A-D. Each combines hardware fault tolerance and diagnostic coverage.
PL ↔ SIL CL mapping
Annex C of IEC 62061 (informative) maps PL a-e from ISO 13849 to SIL CL 1-3. PL d ≈ SIL 2, PL e ≈ SIL 3. Used at the boundary between ISO 13849 designs and IEC 62061 / IEC 61508 component certifications.

Notes & guidance

When to choose IEC 62061 vs ISO 13849

Both are harmonized under the EU Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC. Both cover the safety control system of a machine. They produce the same level of risk reduction if applied correctly. The choice is mostly about vocabulary and tooling preferences:

AspectISO 13849-1IEC 62061
VocabularyPL a-e, Categories B/1/2/3/4SIL 1-3, Architectures A-D
OriginMechanical engineering tradition (ex-EN 954-1)IEC 61508 machinery adaptation
ModeHigh demand only (PFHD)High demand only (PFHD)
SoftwareSimplified treatmentFull IEC 61508-3 software requirements
Component certificationWide (Pilz, Sick, Schmersal libraries)Wide (overlaps with IEC 61508)
Designer toolSISTEMA (free, IFA)Spreadsheet calculators, less mature tooling
Best fitStandard machinery (assembly lines, conveyors, presses)Complex machinery with significant programmable electronic content

In practice: ISO 13849 dominates Europe for typical machinery. IEC 62061 is used when:

  1. The machine has substantial embedded software logic (Cat 4 + complex software → IEC 62061 software requirements are more rigorous)
  2. The vendor wants to leverage existing IEC 61508 component certifications without rework
  3. The machine sits at the boundary between machinery and process industry (e.g., a packaging machine in a chemical plant) where SIL language matches the rest of the safety functions

The 4 architectures

IEC 62061 simplifies architectures into 4 classes:

ArchDescriptionEquivalent ISO 13849
ASingle channel, no diagnosticsCat B / 1
BSingle channel with diagnostics (test before use)Cat 2
CRedundant channels (1oo2), no diagnosticsCat 3 (partial)
DRedundant channels with cross-monitoring + diagnosticsCat 3 / Cat 4

For SIL 3 (the typical maximum in machinery), architecture D is required: dual channel with cross-monitoring achieving DC > 99%.

Joint convergence work (on hold)

ISO and IEC started a joint project — IEC/ISO 17305 — to unify ISO 13849 and IEC 62061 into a single standard. The work was suspended around 2015 due to unresolved methodological differences. As of 2026, both standards remain active and both will continue to be harmonized under the upcoming Machinery Regulation 2027 (replacing the 2006 Directive).

For practitioners: pick one, document the choice in your Safety Requirements Specification, and stick with it for the whole machine. Mixing approaches on the same SRECS creates documentation nightmares.

Industries concernées

  • Industrial machinery (machine tools, presses, robots)
  • Packaging and converting machines
  • Material handling (cranes, conveyors)
  • Process machinery (mixers, separators)
  • Mining machinery
  • Food processing equipment

Pour aller plus loin